First steps on a long road to recovery…

Team India took a few strong steps on its road to recovery after her exit from the World Cup 2007 Tournament left her many fans in a state shock and disbelief.

India first beat Ireland and then, South Africa. The 2-1 win over South Africa must give the team hope, resolve and confidence. The matches were played in Ireland in conditions that would have probably suited South Africa’s game more than it did, India’s. Moreover, India were without some of their key players for all three games. And let’s not forget that South Africa is currently the #2 ranked ODI team in the world — to India’s sixth.

But the road to recovery is long and it is arduous. Sterner tests await — first against Pakistan and then against England.

Moreover, I believe that this tour has not answered as many questions as it ought to have.

In the main, the one un-answered issue is around team-balance. There seems to me to be some confusion on whether or not the team goes in with 4-bowlers or 5-bowlers. At the risk of sounding like a boring parrot, I think that this is where the lack of an all-rounder option hurts the team. If only Irfan Pathan was in better form/fitness. If only Dinesh Mongia was more consistent (or had someone in the team-think-tank whose trust he had). If only.

This dilly-dallying can hurt the team and its long-term chances badly.

It seems to me that the team has almost decided on Zaheer Khan and Ajit Agarkar as its main two bowlers. The team will chose between R. P. Singh and Sree Sreesanth for the 3rd seamer. While this is fine, in theory, this reliance on Agarkar is somewhat frightening to me. One just can’t predict which of the Agarkars will turn up on match day! The sooner Team India makes up its mind on this, the better things will be, in my view! The back-up bowling strength looks strong — even considering Ishant Sharma’s not-too-bright start. With Ishant Sharma, Ranadeb Bose, Munaf Patel and Rakesh Patel waiting in the wings, one could suggest that there is reasonable bench strength. Moreover, in Piyush Chawla and Romesh Powar, India has two steady spin bowlers. They will be tested severely in the game against Pakistan though. One mad over to Afridi or Pietersen may be enough to wreck either of these two spinners! It will be good to see how they fare in that game. Neverthelsee, signs are there that the bowling is pulling things together. They need to bowl in the right areas and with far greater discipline. Hopefully the appointment of Venkatesh Prasad is helping here.

It seems to me that the team has reverted to the old-firm of Tendulkar-Ganguly at the top. While that is fine in theory, I’d need to see the middle-order play with more fire and grit than it had in the past when Tendulkar and Ganguly fell cheaply and early. The last match yielded some signs that, with Dravid coming in at #4 and with a more responsible Yuvraj and a dependable Karthik to follow, there are promising signs for the future. For this reliance, Yuvraj’s role is extremely vital. He has to be the clinical finisher that Michael Bevan was; the finisher that Mike Hussey is! But there are signs of the batting holding together. However, one swallow does not make a summer. Time will tell whether reverting to the Ganguly-Tendulkar old-firm is a good move. If Tendulkar and Ganguly open, it is in my view necessary for Dravid to come in at #4 to hold things together in the face of a mini-collapse. This then makes the role of the #3 quite crucial. And this is where, I think, the team needs to invest.

And this brings into question Gautam Gambhir’s role! I am not sure if his role has been either decided or clarified. He seems to me to be caught in a shall-I-attack or shall-I-defend frame mind. And this results in a rabbit-caught-in-headlights type situation. Not the best situation for anyone to be in.

Oh! How we yearn for a fit and strong Irfan Pathan at #3! The advantage of a person like Pathan at #3 is that, along with the 4 other bowlers (8, 9, 10 and 11) he will make the bowling complement. Moreover, he has the ability to hit out — if the start has been brisk — or buckle down with tight defense — in the event of a disaster start.

And mind you, we haven’t talked yet of a fit and fighting Virender Sehwag!

Sigh! If wishes were horses, pigs would fly!


7 responses to “First steps on a long road to recovery…

  1. As far as I can see, team has got back to its most experienced openers only because of the conditions. Which other batsman could you have trusted with the ball darting around in the beginning? No other person has either the technique or resolve to grit the new ball out as well as keep scoring in such conditions.

    Gambhir is waste of space because he just can’t score against decent sides. I think selectors need to be clear in their mind here.

    Team selection should be done according to the conditions. Can you imagine what a great thread Munaf would have here as first change on these seaming tracks?

  2. Gambhir is probably looked at as a replacement for Ganguly in the near future. Afterall Gambhir is an attacking opener and the no 3 spot is ideal for him to play freely. Having a flexible 4/5 bowler strategy is not bad in the long run. Things can change according to the situation and the wicket. Yesterday’s match was an example of how India adopted the 4 bowler strategy perfectly. Agarkar should play in matches outside India, especially England, Australia and New Zealand. He is a wicket taker but he can get up on the wrong side of the bed quite frequently. One only hopes that with age some old habits may die down.

  3. I am still baffled that Uthappa wasn’t given a go. Maybe he will be given a game against Pakistan.

  4. Srikanth Mangalam


    I do not feel as concerned about the Indian batting order. I still feel that the problem (if any) lies more with the uncertainty in the bowling department. As you said, with Karthik batting at 6 or 7 (as it may turn out), batting looks formidable and reliable. I do not miss an all rounder as much, the combination of Yuvraj, Ganguly, and Tendulkar should work out fine. I think the additional batting position (if we are not playing the 5th bowler) should be where we experiment for the future. Hopefully one of Gambhir, Uthappa, Rohit Sharma, Manoj Tiwary etc. will click.

    I would like to see some consistency develop with respect to at least two of 4/5 bowlers. Hopefully Venky is working on that.

    All in all, like most times, the teams looks good and with luck going our way (including Mr. Dar), we should come out on top …

  5. Pingback: Pathan’s resurrection « i3j3Cricket :: A blog for fans of Indian cricket…

  6. IMHO batting order is very important in a one-day side. We seem to be experimenting with Gambhir, Uthappa in that slot. Not sure if that experiment will succeed. If this experiment does not succeed, then they would experiment with some other newbee so on. I can understand Dhoni pinch-hitting at No.3 in some special situations.

    The first 4 batsmen get the maximum chance to face the overs. So, it should be the best players.

    N0. 5, No.6 players may get their chance around 35+ overs, and so they have to play with controlled aggression like Michael Bevan.

    PS: With all these ideas, can’t I be the coach of the Indian team 😉

  7. Stick to your day job gnbmdr… 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s