As the world laughs, IPL Saints and IPL Warriors argue

World Champions in cricket to laughing stock of cricket.

That statement represents Indian cricket’s journey over the last 20 months; the Indian cricket team has slipped from being World Champions in the 50-over format of the game and in Test cricket, to being a laughing stock of world cricket. India has not been playing good cricket for well over eighteen months. That is known. At the Eden Gardens in Kolkata last week, the team played terrible cricket.

But there is more to being the laughing stock than just ugly cricket.


The power that the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) wields in world cricket is delivered by its impressive fan base. The fans weather rotten conditions — and  abject treatment from stadium officials — to watch the game at ill-equipped grounds in India. The fans often endure a breathlessly unceasing series of advertisements (and sometimes the verbiage of boisterous and clamorous anchors) to watch the game on television sets across the globe. The fan supports the game and continues to provide power to the BCCI, which, in turn, continues to stretch the boundary conditions of the blind commercial greed envelope that it holds — mostly triumphantly.

It is not the BCCI’s fault that they have this power and this advantage at the global decision table. It is not to the organisation’s credit either that they continue to tear into the game at every level. And despite their best intentions, they do.

There is a growing view around the world of cricket that the BCCI is a self-serving organisation that does not have the best interests of either world cricket and/or (more sadly) Indian cricket. Gideon Haigh develops this thesis compellingly in his lovely book, “Sphere of Influence”. Others have been more vocal in expressing more or less this view of the BCCI and the way in which it runs (er, ruins) cricket in India; and the way in which it throws its weight around in world cricket. I do not subscribe to that view entirely, merely because the BCCI has been allowed to be a “bully”.


When the Indian team was performing exceedingly well, it is likely that this perceived bullying built up envy and resentment in cricket communities around the world. But, all of those negative views were ignored or brushed aside mainly because the team performed well and was well-served by strong and impressive individuals in it like Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman, Anil Kumble and Saurav Ganguly; virtuous men of integrity, probity and repute.

Most of them have now exited, stage-left. And with them, the results went too. Today, the envy and resentment in several cricket communities around the world has given way to Indian cricket being a bit of a laughing stock.

India may still win the last Test against England in Nagpur to square the series. There is much pride at stake. India does not easily lose series at home; and that too by huge margins. But the scars inflicted by England at the Eden Gardens will, I believe, remain for a long time.

We accepted when the team lost badly in England and Australia. We accepted when the team scrapped to secure wins at home against New Zealand and West Indies. Today, the team does not appear to have the ticker to win even in home conditions.

The exit of Ganguly, Kumble, Dravid and Laxman exposed the strange functioning of a selection committee. It is not easy to replace experience overnight. The replacements weren’t ready. That is to be expected. Teams — even good teams — go through peaks and troughs. However, the better teams bounce out of the trough through review, introspection, reflection and honest self-examination.

Instead, what we have seen is consistent denial, a plethora of weak strategies, weak policies and an unsure domestic competition. The nature and the number of tweaks to the domestic structure over the last few years suggests a lack of clarity about the role that domestic cricket plays in India. The domestic competition has been tinkered with much more in the last few years than Shahid Afridi has retired.


After India had won the World Cup in April 2011, a handshake in Dominica started the slide. Cricket fans were polarized into two groups: the Keyboard Warriors who criticized the Dominica handshake and the Keyboard Saints who were calm and dispassionate in their understanding of the handshake. The saints nodded wisely and poured cold water over the warriors in a bid to calm them.

Since the Dominica handshake, a succession of humbling defeats against England and Australia were hard to fathom. The few hard-fought wins against West Indies and New Zealand at home provided a smokescreen that concealed a malaise that probably ran deeper. What hurt most was this recent capitulation against England — at home!

Today, many of the then saints have become warriors and the warriors have all but given up on the team.

At the start of this important journey, the team stood on the cusp greatness. A ‘clutch’ moment was discarded. The team now stands on a perilous and unhealthy ledge.

The saints and warriors, meanwhile, continue to fight: over the IPL and its impact on the team’s slide from greatness to near obscurity.


In my view, the IPL has had a major role to play in this decline. I am an IPL Warrior.

The IPL Saints will point out that the tournament was first played in 2008. India became the number 1 Test cricket side only in 2009. The IPL Saints will argue that the IPL may, therefore, have had a positive impact on the Test side. The other argument that the IPL Saints normally put forth is that other teams like South Africa, Australia and England have T20 tournaments too. Moreover, players from these countries play in the IPL too. Yet, these three teams have reached higher rankings in the last 18 months and play better Test cricket than India has. Hence, they will argue that there is no real correlation between the IPL (and other domestic T20 variants) and the national Test team performance. Finally the IPL Saints also argue that India has more domestic cricket players and can, hence, support an IPL competition without the concomitant burn-out risk to players in the national Test team.


The ‘strength in numbers’ argument is as lazy as the one that goes “India is a country of over 1 billion people, why can it not win even one Olympic Gold medal?”

In terms of physical stresses, we just cannot easily compare players from Australia and South Africa to Indian players. That argument does not carry easily. Firstly, people from different cultures have a different structure and make up; Indians work and train differently. Indian players approach the game differently. We aren’t renowned for the intensity of (and focus in) our training. We lack the excessive reliance on science in our training methods. That is very much an occidental approach. Teams from Australia, England and South Africa rely on focus, agility, physical strength, team discipline and ‘playing for each other’. It runs in their blood. Indians rely more on hand-eye coordination, hand speed, timing and silken skills. In that sense, we are more VVS Laxman than we are Rahul Dravid.

The IPL does therefore, in my view, stress out players from India differently. The length, the duration, the intensity and the incessant nature of the competition takes a great toll on the bodies and minds of players from India. The fatigue was apparent in Dominica. It was obvious in the 0-4 loss to England. Since then, I believe the team just lost it completely. I cannot explain the 0-4 loss to Australia in any other way. I am unable to come to terms with — leave alone explain — the loss at Eden.

The arguments will continue; and they must. The team must introspect and reflect. So must the board and we fans. For example, we still do not know if a report on (and review of) the 0-8 loss was even commenced.

The time for change is now. A loss at Nagpur ought to commence it. A win at Nagpur may only provide band-aid that will serve to delay change for a while longer…

— Mohan (@mohank)

13 responses to “As the world laughs, IPL Saints and IPL Warriors argue

  1. In your last section, you mention how we aren’t as focused on training and training methods as some other sides. Don’t you think THAT is the area we need to be improving on then?

  2. The reason I say that is, if you look at the side, guys like Zaheer, Sehwag have no right to be playing for India considering the physical shape they are in. Don’t you agree?

    • Of course we have to work on that. But my larger point is that timing, hand-eye coordination, elegance and attractive cricket seem to matter much more to us than the boring monotony of training intensity and focus. We are just not made that way. Given that, we need much more time to recover from games than many other teams perhaps? But yes, at a general level, fitness ought to play a much greater role in team selection than it appears to be at the moment,

  3. When did we win the World Cup in April 2002? Which world?

    Just kidding. 😀

  4. Okay, on topic…

    I agree with the general sense here however, I think there was something else going behind the 4-0s against England and Australia. Both the times, we were in a good position before we conceded it during key moments that shaped the entire series. In England, we were in the lead with a set pair going nicely when Broad’s hat trick broke the back of the innings and we couldn’t recover.

    Once we lost the second match from that position, I couldn’t see much of a fight. That’s the one thing that’s missing in this team: whenever the opposition tries to dominate, we let them take that position pretty easily, without putting in any effort.

    Even in Australia, we started on the right note before we were bowled out for 284. The series was conceded right there and then. We didn’t put up a fight. I don’t see how players like VVS Laxman and Rahul Dravid would be affected by the IPL pressure — they have been there for a long time and in case of Laxman, he doesn’t even play in the IPL all that much.

    Coming to India, we expected England to come here and roll over. In the words of Rahul Dravid, we were looking for easy wins with the rank turners, etc. Once Pietersen took the attack to us, once he started dominating and we let them pile those runs, we again seemed to stop putting in the fight.

    Putting the entire blame on losing just these key moments would be naive, of course, for there are other factors as well. These factors, however, have always been there—we have never been as fit as, say, the Australians or the South Africans but we have been able to compete with them in the last decade with _almost_ the same set of players who played England and South Africa.

    It’s the inability to put in a fight which, to me, is inexplicable. I don’t know what causes it; I don’t know why we let the opposition run away with the game so easily; I don’t know why we don’t even try and come back.

    It is the time for change, and that I completely agree with.

  5. Totally agree with you Shubam, and you are quite right. I did not say it in the piece, but there are no silver bullets here. There are no closed form solutions. But this inability to put up a fight and hang in there is suggestive of and indicative of the Dominica-handshake malaise I refer to (although indirectly). There is a fatigue there that is quite inexplicable to me.

  6. To inject some humour on the serious topic of the Indian team faring badly against England, I read a post on England’s “tactics” that is relevant 🙂

    …. The thinnest guy is called broad, ugliest guy is called swann, slowest fielder is trott, guy who is ‘behind’ the stumps is called prior, and guy whose father’s name is john is called peter-son .and the best batsman is a cook !

    ab hamari team ko itna confuse karoge to woh kaise khel payegi….. these tactics are very bad for a gentleman’s game

  7. The Sun (Srinivasan ) doesn’t care while the dogs are barking at him. Only thing this Srinivasan is interested is that his income is more than that of the other Srinivasan @ Thirupathi.

    IN the past due to their whimsical selection policies BCCI was called a “bunch of
    jokers”but at present they have improved upon their joker tag to be called ‘board of
    cricket clowns in india”as their present selection of indian team to play against england
    shows ..even after massive defeats against england in tests and against arch rival
    pakisthan in onedayers bcci hasnt lerant a lesson picking up more or less the same team
    that utterly failed to play as a unit for last on and a half years after winning the
    world cup at mumbai in 2011..during this period india was comprehensively whitewashed by
    australia and england in home series too yet this same players retained indeed is the joke
    of this year making all indians call bcci as clowns of india ..or else how can one retain
    rohit sharam who hasnt scored double digits for last few onedayers yet being a permanent
    fixture in indian team at the same time one manoj tiwari who has scored whenever
    oppurtunity was bestowed on him has been sidelined for unknown reasons ..and experts like
    gavaskar backing rohitsharma for the way he scored his 4runs in a onedayer that needs a
    recall to indian team seems the last nail on indian fans head to hear ..when bowlers are
    the main culprits particularly pacers over this slump of indian cricket sreeshanth
    overlooked indeed is surprising ..her is indias best strike bowler at present who has
    proved his fitness and bowling skills against england team the other day at palam playing
    for indian “A”TEAM not named even when indian bowlers cant stem the rot of rival batsman
    bamboozles everyone nice it would have been sreeshanth bowling his SWINGING SEAM at
    full steam at his home ground kochi which would have boosted his confidence as well .but
    indian cricket selection curse of “quota’system saw to it that sree doesnt figure in
    indian team for coming 3 onedayers against engalnd ..non performing stars like
    yuvarajs,rainas,kohlis ,gambirs
    ,dindas,ishantsharmas,amitmishras,dineshkarthiks,piyushchawlas are being given extended
    rope to prove their mettle wereas sreeshanth,parvezrasool the promising off spinner from
    pandey,jalajsaxena,manoj tiwari,ambati
    rayadu,ajinykyarahane,shikardhawan,muralivijay,karnataks wicketkeeper
    c.m.gautam,ALLROUNDER imtiaz ahamed of UP,keralas another promising fast bowler
    sandeepwarrier are never given such long rope to show their skills making all die hard
    fans of indian cricket to rename BCCI(BOARD OF CONTROL OF CRICKET IN INDIA)INTO BOARD OF

  9. Well I think that the recent failure of India in the test series against England and in the ODI series against Pakistan is because of this IPL becaise the youngsters are only looking to score in the IPL without any solid techniques and by playing slough shots and they are not paying any attention what so ever on developing their techniques so I think the criticism on IPL is right.t’s only money nothing else.

  10. I seriously love your blog.. Very nice colors & theme.
    Did you develop this web site yourself? Please reply back as I’m hoping to create my very own website and would love to find out where you got this from or exactly what the theme is called. Appreciate it!

  11. This is because if a website is constantly down, the search engines will eventually start to disregard it entirely
    and maybe not even place it in the search engines at all.
    Anti-spam strategy- Spamming is very rampant but then again it can be vetoed if the hosting business has an anti-spam plan. At present there are
    so many servers related to web hosting that it becomes difficult for
    common man or a lay man in this field to distinguish
    and choose the best web hosting server for his own blog or website.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s