Poor Team Selection – Commentary Team


I have been extremely fortunate in being able to watch all international cricket games on TV thanks to Shan Chandrasekar, the owner and promoter of Asian Television Network. Thanks to his business genius, Canadians have been able to enjoy and relish cricket on television for next to nothing. While the abundunce of cricket on TV has certainly lit up our living rooms, we have as a result, been subject to a diverse set of commentators across the globe — some good and some not quite so.

The choice for the commentary team (I believe most series have multiples sets of teams representing the respective nations/channels) has been entirely dependent on the feed source for ATN. As a result, for example, during the recently concluded series in South Africa, we were subjected to bordeline racist commentary from the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC).

Folks like Barry Richards seemed to have free reign in what they could say, and therefore commented on everything from Ganguly’s mother to the selection of the Mumbai team for the Ranji Trophy. Richards’s comments irked Sunil Gavaskar too. It seemed that everytime South Africa won a game, the arrogance-levels and ignorance-levels of the commentary-team went up a notch. It was indeed a sense of relief listening to a slightly less jingoistic tune on the Indian set — provided by Ravi Shastri, et al — when I caught the last few games of that series (the games that mattered most) in India.

I have also had the opportunity in the recent past to watch less important games (from a viewership standpoint) like the Challenger Trophy. I have observed the steady rise of mediocre commentators in India as well. The likes of Laxman Sivaramakrishnan, Arun Lal, Atul Wassan, Saba Karim, Rohan Gavaskar, Nayan Mongia, et al, have certainly taken a fondness to the mike. Star value apart, the quality of their analysis and reporting is somewhat pathetic. What is most irritable about their reporting is their penchant for irresponsible comment, particularly on matters of importance such as selection and player performance. The less said about their non-perceptive, shallow reporting of actuals on the field, the better!

Sachin Tendulkar and Rahul Dravid, during a recent awards ceremony gathering, responded sharply albeit professionally to some of this frivoulousness from the commentators’ box. For someone like Sachin Tendulkar to publicly snap petulantly indicates the level of disgust.

You can see the YouTube video of the Arun Lal interview with Sachin Tendulkar on the victory podium. Sachin Tendulkar’s irritation is easy to see. Moreover, at the end, watch the whole Indian team appluad Tendulkar’s retort. Also notice how Tendulkar stresses that it was because of the help from the team, fans and family that he made his comeback. In other words, “No thanks to you jokers.”

It is not necessary that only exceptional cricketers make good commentators. Mark Nicholas, for example, has done a very good job. He has a deep knowledge of the game. He reads the game well. He is unbiased. He is also non-parochial. He calls well and he is also somewhat sharp and witty. These are the traits that are required.

While, the selection of the Indian team has been outstanding in the recent past and importantly so, I am not sure that the same applies to the selection of the commentary teams around the world.

It may have something to do with the contractual obligations of production companies. However we are unable to hear/watch the likes of Sanjay Manjrekar, Ravi Shastri, or Harsha Bhogle more often. They are amongst the best from India.

I do wish there was a way that viewers could comment/vote on the quality of the commentary team — we pay for hearing them after all.

My wish list for the commentary team at the World Cup would be:

  • India – Sanjay Manjrekar, Ravi Shastri, Harsha Bhogle
  • Australia – Ian Chappell, Ian Healy and Mark Taylor
  • Pakistan – Rameez Raja, Wasim Akram (maybe)
  • England – Mark Nicholas, Naseer Hussain, Mike Atherthon, Peter Roebuck
  • New Zealand – Ian Smith, Martin Crowe
  • South Africa – Allan Donald, Daryl Cullinan
  • West Indies – Tony Cozier, Ian Bishop, Michael Holding
  • Sri Lanka – None (Roshan Mahanama was good before he took up the ICC job)

Srikanth

13 responses to “Poor Team Selection – Commentary Team

  1. Pat Symcox is a good South African commentator.

  2. Bring back Sidhu 🙂

  3. Though I agree with the article. I beg to differ on Sidhu.Two people who should be kept off the TV and commentary box is Sidhu and Kapil Dev.Clearly they are after publicity not cricket.

  4. I mostly agree with the list. I would knock off Wasim Akram from the list as I believe he does not add anything substantial. I don’t mind Sunny Gavaskar being added to this list.

  5. I wasn’t being serious. The further we keep Sidhu from the microphone, the better. Maybe we should start by revoking his bail 😉

    His oneliners do provide comic relief, though. Here is a sampling –

    http://writingvillage.net/Sidhuisms/
    http://www.dinesh.com/India_Jokes-Humor/Sidhuisms/

  6. The overall picture is that there is a substrate of conceptual structure in chimps, overlain by some uniquely human but not necessarily language-based subsystems, in turn overlain by subsystems that depend on the pre-existence of linguistic expression. ,

  7. I like what you guys tend to be up too. This kind of clever work and coverage!
    Keep up the terrific works guys I’ve added you guys to
    my personal blogroll.

  8. I was recommended this web site by my cousin. I am not sure
    whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about my difficulty.

    You’re incredible! Thanks!

  9. It’s appropriate time to make some plans for the future and it’s
    time to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I wish to suggest you some interesting things or
    advice. Perhaps you could write next articles
    referring to this article. I wish to read even more things about
    it!

  10. If you follow the trend and meet your consumers right where they are, you’ll harvest the fruit of your efforts and
    enjoy additional exposure and profits. You should also think about posting on websites like Associated Content or Hub – Pages under
    your name. Social media link building increases your SEO rankings by creating fresh content and by building
    the number of links to your website.

  11. Deshalb spricht man auch von Freiklettern (engl.: Climbing, Freeclimbing).

    Kindergeburtstage einen Leitfaden festgelegt. Aachen
    Aichach Alsdorf Arnsberg Bad Hersfeld Bad Kreuznach Baden-Baden Bayreuth Bergisch Gladbach Bruchsal
    Dettelbach Dormagen Dresden Eisenach Elmshorn Erding Eschwege Euskirchen
    Frankfurt Freyung Friedrichshafen Goslar Gotha Hamm Kassel Königsbrunn Kulmbach Leipzig Leverkusen Limburg Lippstadt Lörrach Mannheim Marburg Meitingen Memmingen Münster Naumburg Neckarsulm Neu-Ulm
    Neufahrn Neumünster Nürnberg Olpe Paderborn Passau Penzing Pforzheim Reutlingen Rudolstadt Saalfeld Selb Siegburg Singen Suhl Troisdorf Ulm Vilsbiburg Warburg Wiesbaden Bitte wählen Sie Ihre Stadt Aachen Aichach Alsdorf Arnsberg Bad Hersfeld Bad Kreuznach Baden-Baden Bayreuth Bergisch Gladbach Berlin Bruchsal Dettelbach Dormagen Dresden Eisenach Elmshorn Erding Eschwege Euskirchen Falkensee Frankfurt Freyung Friedrichshafen Goslar Gotha Hamm Kassel Königsbrunn
    Kulmbach Leipzig Leverkusen Limburg Lippstadt Lörrach Mannheim Marburg Meitingen Memmingen Münster
    Naumburg Neckarsulm Neu-Ulm Neufahrn Neumünster Nürnberg Olpe Paderborn Passau
    Penzing Pforzheim Reutlingen Rudolstadt Saalfeld Selb Siegburg Singen Suhl Troisdorf Ulm Vilsbiburg Warburg Wiesbaden.

    • Even if these are notable astrological events we are having a little
      breather after being hammered by all those strong constellations lately.
      This will be a common theme, because everything is made of
      Legos in this place. 7 million, which was less than 1% of
      what he was worth.

    • All addictions are ways of avoiding the feelings that you
      believe you can’t manage. These are for types of games that require guessing or logic to figure
      out how the game parts are completed. Just like
      choosing subjects at school, they can choose the character they play
      with and then they analyze his weakness and advantages.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s