Musings on the Twenty20 team

I was writing up my comments to Sanjay’s post, but decided to write a separate post as it was getting too long 🙂

In my opinion, here are the pre-requisites for picking up a Twenty20 side –

  • For a batsman, you should have a good strike rate and the ability  to improvise.
  • All players in the team should be able to field really well (this probably disqualifies someone like Munaf and Ishant)
  • As a bowler, you should have the ability to contain runs more than the ability to take wickets. If you can also take wickets, it is a bonus. (My logic is that if you can contain the flow of runs in Twenty20, the wickets will automatically fall)
  • Wicket keepers must be good batsmen.
  • The team should have a good mix of allrounders (at least 3 in the playing XI). The definition of an allrounder for a Twenty20 is very different to an allrounder in other forms of the game. In Twenty20, if you are batsman who can bowl at 2-3 overs every match, you can be considered to be an all rounder. Or if you are a bowler who can be relied to get around 25 runs. (I would consider people like Dinesh Mongia, Sehwag and Yuvraj to be “batting” allrounders, whereas people like Irfan Pathan can be considered “bowling” allrounders. It’s a pity Mongia wasn’t considered)
  • Bowlers who can throw their bat about to score some quick runs is also a bonus.

So dividing up the team into batsmen, allrounders, bowlers and WK Batsmen, this is what we get –

Batsmen Allrounder Bowler WK Batsmen
M Kaif
S Raina
M Tiwary
K Goel
C Pujara
R Sharma
G Gambhir
A Srikkanth
R Uthappa
Niraj Patel
V Sehwag
Yuvraj Singh
I Pathan
Y Pathan
J Sharma
N Behera
Praveen Kumar
Z Khan
RP Singh
I Sharma
R Pawar
P Chawla
H Singh
M Patel
Ramesh Powar
MS Dhoni
D Karthik


Of this lot, Manoj Tiwary, Rohit Sharma, Karan Goel and Niraj Patel can bowl a few overs, but I have still listed them as batsmen. Similarly Agarkar, Powar and Chawla can bat a bit, but I’ve listed them as bowlers. In fact they have all got hundreds to their name either in tests (Agarkar),  Ranjis (Powar) or U-19 cricket (Chawla). Zaheer and Bhajji are also capable of swinging the bat around for a few runs – but none of them can claim the tag of all rounder.

I can understand Goel and Niraj Patel being named in the short list – they had both scored over 300 runs in the domestic Twenty20 competition. Even Srikkanth Anirudha’s inclusion can be justified – he had scored 285 runs at a good strike rate. His fellow opener Devendran should consider himself very unlucky to have been left out of the squad after also making 285 in the competition.  What baffles me is the selection of Abhishek Jhunjhunwala. Jhunjhunwala didn’t have a great Twenty20 competition nor a great Ranji One Day tournament. I hope he is not in to fill up the “zonal” quota. Maybe he is a really good bat and the selectors see potential in him.

Y Pathan, Behera and Praveen Kumar are probably in the team mainly because the selectors are looking for more allrounders.

I think the following 12 have a very high probability of being picked in the XV –

Sehwag, Uthappa, Raina, Yuvraj, Karthik, Dhoni, Tiwary, Z Khan, Sreesanth, Agarkar, Powar, Chawla

This makes up 5 batsmen, 2 allrounders and 5 bowlers.

The remaining three places could go to anyone, but I think it will be split between a batsman, bowler and an allrounder. Irfan Pathan could get the all rounder spot, while Goel, Patel, Rohit Sharma, Gambhir and Anirudha Srikkanth could be fighting for the one batsman spot. RP Singh will probably edge out Munaf Patel and Ishant Sharma. If the tournament was played in the subcontinent then Bhajji would have probably been a better choice. I would have personally preferred to go with one additional all rounder in the XV, but we may have to make do with the odd over from someone like Tiwary or Raina.

So, the likely XV could end up being –

Sehwag, Uthappa, Raina, Yuvraj, Karthik, Dhoni, Tiwary, Z Khan, Sreesanth, Agarkar, Powar, Chawla, I Pathan, RP Singh, Rohit Sharma.



11 responses to “Musings on the Twenty20 team

  1. Hello,

    I have not watched 20/20 matches yet.
    But it is like hitting a 4 or 6 of every ball.

    20/20 seems like Cricket much different from Cricket in its purest form.

  2. Mahesh

    Not sure if two spinners are really necessary (ie., Powar and Chawla). If another spinner is really necessary, I’d go for Yousuf Pathan who is quite a handy bat too.


  3. No way can Powar be chosen over Harbhajan in this form. Powar is a terrible fielder and now a terrible batsman too.

  4. Point taken – Mohan and Chandan. Powar probably isn’t cut out for this flavour of the game and Yusuf Pathan may be a better alternative. The question is, Will the selectors realize this?

  5. “Will the selectors realize this?”

    Most crucial question!

  6. Pingback: India A team « i3j3Cricket :: A blog for fans of Indian cricket…

  7. Abhishek Jhunjhunwala is a brilliant batsman – incase you dont know this. Not making too many runs in one 20-20 match series should not be a reason to promote criticism… he’s actually the 2nd highest run getter in Bengal after Tiwary.

  8. Oh also – he’s also the best fielder in India at the moment – watch him someday and then you will know.

  9. I’ve heard he is a very good fielder, Tushar. I hope you (and the selectors) are right about his batting…

  10. I had seen him playing Ranji final against Bombay. I didn’t find anything to be excited about!

  11. I think Chandan u are very critical – if ur thinking does not change for younger promising players we will keep seeing repeats of Lords all the time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s